DNA Code Essays - DNA, Biological Databases, Forensic Genetics

DNA Code Only a small fraction of our total DNA makes us different from gorillas, chimpanzees and other primates. An even smaller fraction makes one person different from the next. It's these differences that forensic DNA experts use to identify people and determine the source of biological evidence such as blood or semen found at a crime scene. DNA testing is powerful, sensitive and effective in pointing to the guilty and absolving the innocent. To date, 67 convicted felons have been exonerated nationwide based on DNA evidence. The vast majority of those have been rape cases. But DNA testing as it is now performed raises a question as to whether the public should fear that an innocent person may be wrongfully convicted or a legitimate suspect excluded from consideration. Should we be concerned that the government can order the collection of one's DNA for purposes of identification, much like a set of fingerprints? DNA contains much more personal information than a fingerprint. Recognizing the importance of DNA, our government sponsored the Human Genome Project in 1990 to determine the sequence of DNA sub-units within each of our 46 chromosomes. The complete sequence will be deciphered within the next few years. With this information, there will be dramatic advances in many medically related areas, giving doctors the ability to predict illness, make better diagnoses and perform gene therapy to correct sometimes deadly genetic defects. DNA online With the development of specialized machines, it is now relatively easy to make millions of copies of any gene and determine its sequence. With the same equipment, we can determine the genetic composition of anyone who becomes a suspect in a crime. This information can be incorporated into a local, state or national database for future use. In 1998, the FBI laboratory brought its National DNA Index System online. DNA profiles from convicted offenders and crime scene evidence submitted by forensic labs are combined into a single national database. As a result, DNA evidence found at a crime scene in New York can be used to identify a suspect in Virginia if a matching profile is found. New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir has proposed that all those convicted of any crime be required to submit a specimen of their cells for analysis and that their DNA profiles become part of the state's database. The city's mayor, Rudolph Giuliani, has gone even further and endorsed the idea of collecting DNA samples from everyone at birth. Both say the benefits associated with increased testing are well worth the cost to the taxpayer. But do we have anything to fear from universal DNA testing? Many argue that the innocent certainly have nothing to worry about. The perfect science? Forensic DNA analysis is held in such high esteem that it has developed a reputation of infallibility. But is it really the perfect science or can analysts make mistakes? A mistake could cost a suspect his liberty or even his life. This almost happened in England, where a DNA test matched an innocent man to a burglary crime scene. Based on a test using six genes, he was deemed the likely source of the crime scene evidence. He matched the evidentiary profile perfectly. But in a more rigorous 10-gene analysis, conducted because he presented a very strong alibi, he was excluded as a suspect. Britain's DNA database is the largest in the world, consisting of almost 700,000 profiles. When it comes to criminal matters, civil liberties in Britain are apparently less of a concern than they are in the United States. Most English subjects tend to volunteer specimens when police ask them to do so. As with any medical procedure, one must weigh the benefits of DNA testing against any potential downside. There are clearly a number of ethical and legal issues that must be addressed. How can we be sure that someone won't gain access to your genetic profile and sell it to a prospective employer or insurance company? It's a frightening thought, but political candidates may one day find themselves compelled to provide samples of their DNA. Genetic profiles could then influence the way people vote. The good, the bad and the ugly Everything we are is in our DNA -- personality, behavioral traits, intelligence, the likelihood of developing a disease. In other words, the good, the bad and the ugly. To avoid the potential for abuse, the government should just retrieve identifying information from the samples and destroy the rest. I believe that while there are no easy answers, DNA testing is extremely valuable as

The Real King Arthur essays

The Real King Arthur essays In The Once and Future King, the portrayal of the Middle Ages is conceived as that of magnificent castles, beautiful clothing, great kings and queens- everything and everyone perfect. No proof of the dirty, unjust, horrible circumstances that all people lived by- even the nobility- existed throughout the entire novel. The people and places in The Once and Future King are so backward that the story could be described as a fairy tale. Camelot, for one, would not have been so gorgeously described, and looked upon as a majestic land. Towns back then were not pretty. Dirt thrived in cities; there were diseases and crud everywhere. Camelot was also depicted as being in order, and just to everyone. Communities during the Middle Ages were not orderly. They were probably outright chaotic and unjust. As far as the king goes, he probably did not do much to help Arthur, such a great, benevolent king, would not have existed back then. A great king no doubt probably came to reign a time or two but someone who was so great, and did so many things for his kingdom and so influential would not have been formed back then. Kings during the time of The Once and Future King were mostly insane, or cruel, or just should never have been remembered. No king ever did so many things that they would have stood out so much as Arthur would have. As a queen, Guenevere, from The Once and Future King, did not fit the stereotypical-Middle-Age queen. She did not want to marry the king because she did not know him. That does not sound so absurd now-a-days, but back then if someone did not want to marry the king, you were thought of being just as crazy as the king could have been. Given the chance to marry into royalty and live, as close to as you could, easily, you would jump at it in a second. Guenevere was emotional, and had feelings, something The knight was even portrayed in a dreamla ...

Calculating the cash conversion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Calculating the cash conversion - Essay Example This is why a shorter conversion cycle is better. From the excerpt, it is evident that money is held in the stock up to the time when it is sold. It infers that invested cash, or money that was used to purchase this stock is not available, and cannot be used for any other purpose (Brigham & Houston, 2012). Therefore, business must maintain short cash conversion cycle in order to reduce costs associated with inventory storage and depreciation and maintain business liquidity at a higher point. In a nut shell, the cash conversion cycle measure the time in days that the company takes to convert its input resources into cash flows. That is, it reflects the period of time in days that the company takes to sell its stock, collect all cash receivables, and settle its bills (Whittington, 2012). It is conventionally agreed that a company that takes the shortest time is at its bets operations. This is because the cash becomes free as the cash conversion cycle shortens, and the company can invest it, use it for other activities such as purchasing new equipment, infrastructure to boost the returns. Cash conversion cycle is also significant in assessing the efficiency of the management and competitor comparison (Graham & Smart,